ArXiv limits preprint submissions to two per month per submitter, as AI access fuels a record 40,363 submissions in September 2026, vs. 20,569 in September 2024

Your next research preprint submission to arXiv is now limited to two per month.

arXiv has implemented a new policy limiting submitters to two preprint submissions per calendar month and a maximum of three active submissions at any time, effective October 1st, 2026. This change comes in response to a significant surge in submissions, which more than doubled from 20,569 in September 2024 to a record 40,363 in September 2026. The increase is largely attributed to the accessibility of advanced AI tools, which facilitate faster and easier research and writing. While AI is permitted as a research tool if disclosed and if the work meets scholarly standards, moderators have observed an increase in low-quality, narrow-scope, 'salami' (fragmented), and dense AI-generated papers. These submissions consume a disproportionate amount of volunteer moderators' time, potentially delaying the review of quality research. The new rate limits aim to ensure equitable distribution of moderator time, protect the integrity of the arXiv corpus, and encourage authors to submit more curated, substantial work.

The dramatic increase in submissions, driven by AI, has strained arXiv's volunteer moderation system, highlighting a critical bottleneck in academic preprint dissemination. This policy shift signals that open access platforms are grappling with the scalability challenges posed by AI-generated content, forcing a re-evaluation of submission throughput versus quality control. The two-submission limit is a temporary measure, indicating that arXiv is actively seeking more robust, long-term solutions for managing AI-assisted scholarly output.

This development affects researchers who rely on rapid preprint publication to share their findings, potentially delaying dissemination if they have multiple distinct works ready. It also puts pressure on AI tool developers and users to ensure their outputs meet rigorous scholarly standards. Future developments to watch include arXiv's progress in improving moderation tools and the potential for other preprint servers to adopt similar rate-limiting strategies.